Announcement PDF 3 March 2026 Castle Expands WA Gold Exposure with Murchison Acquisition and Board Changes • Castle has expanded its footprint in the Meekatharra gold district of Western Australia through execution of a binding Share Purchase Agreement to acquire 100% of private company, Meekasan Pty Ltd. • The new tenement position acquired covers 68km2 of prime strategic location, ~2km from Westgold Resources’ Paddy’s Flat Gold Operation (historic production 1.5+ Moz) and ~7km from Great Boulder Resources’ Mulga Bill deposit (568 koz @ 2.7g/t), positioning Castle within an established high-grade gold corridor. • Establishes a dominant, contiguous ~184km2 landholding in the Meekatharra district through integration with Castle’s Polelle and Wanganui projects, significantly enhancing exposure to a proven gold province hosting multiple operating and past-producing mines. • Multiple compelling, untested drill targets identified through reprocessed aeromagnetic data, highlighting structural architecture and geophysical signatures analogous to nearby multi-million-ounce systems. • Strong infrastructure advantage located proximal to Bluebird Gold Processing Mill (Westgold) and Meeka Metals’ Murchison Gold Project, geology comparable to established regional producers. • Leadership realignment to drive growth and in-country execution, boasting extensive West Australian and West African gold exploration, development and M&A experience o Mr. Steve Zaninovich appointed as full-time Managing Director, providing dedicated executive leadership to drive the Company’s next phase of growth o Mr. Andrew Grove transitions to Non-Executive Chairman, ensuring strong governance oversight and strategic guidance at Board level o Mr. Mohamed Niaré steps down from the Board to concentrate on advancing Castle’s Côte d'Ivoire operations, reinforcing in-country execution and stakeholder engagement. Castle Minerals Limited (ASX: CDT) (“Castle” or “the Company”) has executed a binding agreement to acquire 100% of private company, Meekasan Pty Ltd (“Meekasan”), creating a dominant ~184km2 strategic landholding in the prolific Meekatharra gold district of Western Australia (the “Meeka South Gold Project”). The transaction secures 68km² of highly prospective, contiguous greenstone tenure immediately adjacent to Westgold Resources’ 1.5Moz+ Paddy’s Flat operation and Great Boulder Resources’ Mulga Bill project, materially strengthening Castle’s exposure to a proven, infrastructure rich gold province. Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Steve Zaninovich, Managing Director of Castle, commented: “This transaction cements Castle’s position as a dominant junior landholder in Meekatharra, consolidating a 184km² contiguous footprint in the heart of a proven multi-million-ounce gold corridor. With demonstrated high-grade RC results at Castle’s Wanganui deposit, together with multiple undrilled targets reflecting the structural architecture of Paddy’s Flat and Mulga Bill, Castle is uniquely positioned for discovery driven growth across the expanded tenure in one of Western Australia’s most infrastructure advantaged gold districts. I am thrilled to be stepping into a full-time executive role to drive Castle’s expanding gold portfolio in Cote d’Ivoire, and now the Western Australian goldfields, establishing dual platforms for discovery in two of the world’s most sought-after jurisdictions for gold exploration.” Strategic Positioning – Emerging Murchison Gold Explorer The proposed acquisition creates a contiguous 184km² gold exploration footprint in the heart of the Meekatharra district, one of Western Australia’s most productive and infrastructure rich gold corridors. • Polelle (98km²) lies ~7km southeast of the Bluebird Gold Processing Mill (Westgold) • Wanganui (18km²) sits ~15km southwest of Bluebird • Meekasan (68km²) contiguous with Castle’s tenure and immediately adjoining the Paddy’s Flat operation (Westgold) and Mulga Bill Project (Great Boulder Resources). Together, the Meeka South Gold Project spans more than 30km of prospective greenstone strike that remains relatively underexplored, with only shallow, wide spaced historical drilling completed to date. Castle is now positioned as one of the largest junior company landholders in the Meekatharra Gold District, controlling multiple drill-ready targets and untested anomalies exhibiting geological and structural settings mirroring those at nearby multi-million-ounce operations. MEEKA SOUTH GOLD PROJECT OVERVIEW The Meekasan licences and applications (listed in Appendix 2) cover 68km² and 30.9km of greenstone strike in the Meekatharra gold district (Figure 1 and Figure 3). The Meekasan ground is contiguous with Castle’s Polelle and Wanganui gold projects (refer Figure 2) and directly adjacent to the Paddy’s Flat Gold Operation (Westgold) and Mulga Bill Project (Great Boulder Resources). The acquisition adds highly complementary, underexplored ground displaying compelling geophysical and geochemical signatures comparable to those associated with nearby operating mines. Demonstrated High-Grade Potential – Wanganui RC Results Historical RC drilling at Wanganui has delivered shallow, high-grade intercepts (refer Castle ASX announcement of 19 August 2020) including: • 3m @ 18.66g/t Au from 62m (CWRC012 – Main Lode) • 8m @ 4.10g/t Au from 66m (CWRC017 – Main Lode) • 10m @ 3.34g/t Au from 56m (CWRC015 – Main Lode) • 3m @ 2.71g/t Au from 62m (CWRC010 – Main Lode) • 8m @ 3.25g/t Au from 43m (CWRC025 – East Lode) Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Figure 1: Castle and Meekasan’s, Meeka South Gold Project and other key operators in the region Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Meekasan Geological & Structural Setting The tenure hosts a favourable greenstone assemblage comprising volcaniclastics (south and east), ultramafic and mafic units (north and south), intersected by WNW-ESE cross cutting structures. Wide spaced geochemical samples have delineated elevated arsenic anomalies within the magnetic high units (Figure 4), a key pathfinder for gold mineralisation. Historical sampling returned 23 soil and stream sediment assays greater than 50ppb Au, including a peak of 763ppb Au (sample 323788)1 . Notably these anomalies remain untested by drilling. Drilling across the Meekasan ground has been limited to 163 shallow RAB/AC holes (average depth 32m, maximum 69m), highlighting considerable upside potential. Geophysical and structural datasets have highlighted windows of basement lithology. These basement lithologies show strong magnetic responses highlighting the complex interaction between magnetic units and structural faults/folds. These interactions are the ideal place for gold mineralisation to occur. This geophysics has been used to interpret basement structures that mainly trend NNW south with several cross-cutting structures and tight isoclinal folding. The main structural lineament through the project is the Polelle Syncline. In addition, the geophysics has identified undrilled magnetic anomalies mirroring the geological setting at nearby Paddy’s Flat, positioning the Company with near-term drill targets. 1 Refer Appendix 1 - JORC Code 2012 Reporting Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Figure 2: Polelle, Wanganui and Meekasan Project Location Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Figure 3: Meekasan magnetics, Polelle syncline and major faults Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Figure 4: Magnetic anomalies identified at Westgold’s (ASX:WGX) Murchison Gold Project and Meekasan’s tenure identified by the white lines Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes MEEKASAN KEY ACQUISITION TERMS The Share Purchase Agreement is subject to customary conditions precedent, including completion of due diligence to Castle’s satisfaction, where required the receipt of all required shareholder, regulatory and third-party approvals, execution of consultancy agreements with key Meekasan representatives for a minimum 12-month period post-settlement and the granting of all tenure. Subject to satisfaction (or waiver) of these conditions, consideration payable to Meekasan comprises: • A non-refundable $15,000 exclusivity fee (60-day period); • $150,000 cash payable at completion (cost reimbursement); • 3,750,000 fully paid ordinary shares at settlement; and • A further 3,750,000 fully paid ordinary shares, 12 months following settlement. FORWARD WORK PLAN The primary focus for the upcoming work program will be a tenement wide soil geochemistry program designed to fully characterise the geochemical signature and mineralisation potential of the Meeka South Gold Project. Gold deposits throughout the Meekatharra district are well known for their distinct alteration halos, typically enriched in arsenic, bismuth and lead. By systematically sampling the tenements, the program will establish a robust geochemical baseline and enable the identification of geochemical alteration patterns associated with gold mineralisation. This dataset will be the first large scale sampling program conducted over the Meekasan tenure and will provide invaluable insight into the geochemical footprint of potential gold systems, refine the exploration targeting already undertaken, and support the prioritisation of follow up drilling. In parallel with the tenement-wide geochemical program, priority targets have been identified from the reprocessed magnetic dataset, and these will be systematically field checked. Where field observations support the geophysical interpretation, these targets will have aircore or RC drilling undertaken to test for bedrock mineralisation and refine structural, lithological, alteration and geochemical controls. LEADERSHIP REALIGNMENT TO DRIVE GROWTH AND IN-COUNTRY EXECUTION Castle has implemented a leadership realignment, with immediate effect, designed to strengthen executive focus and governance oversight as the Company advances its next phase of growth. Mr Steven Zaninovich has been appointed full time Managing Director, transitioning from his previous role as Non-Executive Chairman. His move to an executive capacity provides dedicated operational leadership and strategic execution capability. Mr Andrew Grove will transition to Non-Executive Chairman, bringing more than 30 years of mining industry experience to provide strong governance oversight and strategic guidance at Board level. Mr Mohamed Niaré will step down as a Director and continue in his key operational role as In-Country Project and Business Development Manager in Côte d’Ivoire, ensuring continued on the ground leadership, stakeholder engagement and advancement of Castle’s West African portfolio. Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Managing Director Appointment – Key Terms The Company has entered into an Executive Services Agreement with Mr Steven Zaninovich, appointing him as Managing Director effective 1 March 2026. Mr Zaninovich will receive a base salary of $275,000 per annum including statutory superannuation (subject to periodic review). Subject to shareholder approval at the next general meeting, Mr Zaninovich will be issued 10,000,000 Performance Rights in five equal tranches, designed to align executive remuneration with sustained share price appreciation and material resource growth. Performance Rights (each tranche 2,000,000 rights, 5-year expiry): • Tranche A – Vest upon the Company achieving a 20-day VWAP of $0.12 or greater within three years of issue. • Tranche B – Vest upon the Company achieving a 20-day VWAP of $0.24 or greater within three years of issue. • Tranche C – Vest upon announcement of a JORC (2012) Inferred Mineral Resource of at least 250,000oz Au Eq at ≥1.0g/t Au Eq across any Company tenement. • Tranche D – Vest upon announcement of a JORC (2012) Inferred Mineral Resource of at least 500,000oz Au Eq at ≥1.0g/t Au Eq. • Tranche E – Vest upon announcement of a JORC (2012) Inferred Mineral Resource of at least 1,000,000oz Au Eq at ≥1.0g/t Au Eq. Mr Zaninovich will also be entitled to a change of control payment equal to 12 months’ base salary. Either party may terminate the agreement without cause upon six months’ written notice. END This announcement was authorised for release to the ASX by the Board of Castle Minerals Limited. For further information please contact: Steve Zaninovich Managing Director enquiries@castleminerals.com Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes ABOUT CASTLE MINERALS Castle Minerals Limited (ASX: CDT) is a gold explorer with extensive tenure positions in northern Ghana, eastern Côte d’Ivoire and Western Australia, some of the world’s premier gold producing regions. Within its portfolio in the Upper West Region of Ghana, Castle holds the Kpali and Kandia Gold Projects. The Company is contracted to earn interests in seven permits (one granted, six in application) along the Côte d’Ivoire – Ghana border. All projects are located on fertile Birimian greenstone belts, host to numerous multi-million ounce gold mines across Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire and the broader West African region. In Western Australia, Castle has established a dominant, contiguous ~184km2 landholding in the Murchison Gold District providing exposure to a proven gold province hosting multiple operating and past-producing mines. The Company’s Meeka South Gold Project boasts a strong infrastructure advantage located proximal to the Bluebird Gold Processing Mill (Westgold) and near Meeka Metals’ Murchison Gold Project, with geology comparable to established regional producers. Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes STATEMENTS Historical Exploration Results - Competent Person’s Compliance Statement The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the relevant historical market announcements referenced herein. Meekasan Exploration Results - Competent Person’s Compliance Statement The information in this report that relates to historical mineral exploration in relation to tenements held by Meekasan Pty Ltd is based on work reviewed and compiled by Mr. Stephen F Pearson, a Competent Person and Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr. Pearson has been contracted to the Company and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr. Pearson consents to the inclusion in this report of the information in the form and context in which it appears. The Australian Securities Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this release. Cautionary Statement All of Castle’s projects in Australia are considered grassroots or at a relatively early stage of exploration. There has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource. No Competent Person has done sufficient work in accordance with JORC Code 2012 to determine conclusively or to estimate in what quantities gold or other minerals are present. It is possible that, following further evaluation and/or exploration work, confidence in the information used to identify areas of interest may be reduced when reported under the JORC Code (2012). Forward Looking Statement Statements regarding Castle’s plans, forecasts and projections with respect to its mineral properties and programmes are forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that Castle’s plans for the development of its mineral properties will proceed. There can be no assurance that Castle will be able to confirm the presence of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves, that any mineralisation will prove to be economic or that a mine will be successfully developed on any of Castle’s mineral properties. The performance of Castle may be influenced by factors outside the control of the Company, its directors, staff or contractors. Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Appendix 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Meekasan Project • Stream Sampling taken above drainage confluence points • The samples were approximately 2kg in weight and sieved to -2mm size fraction with material taken from the active parts of the drainage avoiding trap sites. Drilling techniques • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise samples representivity. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second- half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. Meekasan Project • Samples were sent to ALS in Perth for bulk Leach Extraction (BLEG) analysis of Au with detection limits of 0.1ppb. Gold levels were determined by aqua regia digestion and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. Meekasan Project • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assays is deemed acceptable for stream sampling • No QAQC recorded in historical report Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Meekasan Project • Results have been verified by additional company personnel. • NA-Surface sampling only • All data stored in electronic format • Assays have not been adjusted Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Meekasan Project • No record of how the samples were located. • All samples in the company database are recorded in MGA94_z50 Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Meekasan Project • Stream samples were collected in drainage patterns which are not on a regular grid pattern, however this is deemed acceptable for first pass exploration Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves un- biased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. Meekasan Project • Not recorded in historical reports Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. Meekasan Project • No audits or reviews undertaken Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material. • issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native. • title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Meekasan Project • The Project area is located approximately 4km south-east of Meekatharra in the Northern Goldfields, Western Australia. The tenement which the steam sample is located on in questions is P51/3326 and is owned by Meekasan Pty Ltd • The tenement is in good standing with no known impediments Exploration done by other parties. • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Meekasan Project Exploration results in the tenement in question have been very limited. The only work undertaken to date has been; • Stream sampling undertaken by Mines and Resources Australia Pty Ltd in 1998-1999 reporting period (WAMEX A58432) at their Sandstone Road project and as part of combined reporting group C98/1998 • Gridded soil sampling undertaken by Mines and Resources Australia Pty Ltd in 1998-1999 reporting period (WAMEX A58432) at their Sandstone Road project and as part of combined reporting group C98/1998 • Two lines of RAB drilling also undertaken by Mines and Resources Australia Pty Ltd in 1998-1999 reporting period (WAMEX A58432) at their Sandstone Road project and as part of combined reporting group C98/1998 • One line of AC drilling undertaken by Yilgarn Exploration Ventures Pty Ltd in 2020-2021 reporting period (WAMEX A127532) at their Tea Well Project Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Meekasan Project • The company is targeting shear hosted lode-style mineralisation as is common in Meekatharra Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:  easting and northing of the drill hole collar  elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary  dip and azimuth of the hole  down hole length and interception depth hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or • minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only • No metal equivalent values reported Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this • effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Meekasan Project • NA-Surface sampling only Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Meekasan Project • Plans and diagrams are included in the announcement. Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Meekasan Project • This announcement adequately summarises historical work • Balanced reporting undertaken. Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. Meekasan Project • No Other exploration data recorded Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. Meekasan Project • Further work is required on the tenement Castle Expands Murchison Gold Footprint & Board Changes Table showing the stream sediments taken by Mines and Resources Australia Pty Ltd Sample_ID Sample_Type Nat_Grid_ID Nat_East NAT_North DTM_RL Au_ppb 323620 SSED MGA94_50 653050.3 7054102.7 500 1.9 323621 SSED MGA94_50 653040.3 7054102.7 500 3.4 323622 SSED MGA94_50 653001.3 7053917.7 500 13.6 323623 SSED MGA94_50 652691.3 7053553.7 500 2 323624 SSED MGA94_50 652699.3 7053448.7 500 1.9 323625 SSED MGA94_50 653051.3 7053293.7 500 4.1 323626 SSED MGA94_50 653436.3 7054468.7 500 6.6 323627 SSED MGA94_50 653453.3 7054502.7 500 4.5 323628 SSED MGA94_50 651575.3 7050769.7 500 1.9 323629 SSED MGA94_50 651571.3 7050764.7 500 1.7 323630 SSED MGA94_50 651372.3 7050612.7 500 3.7 323631 SSED MGA94_50 651206.3 7050141.7 500 1.2 323632 SSED MGA94_50 651867.3 7050299.7 500 2.3 323633 SSED MGA94_50 652056.3 7049794.7 500 1.8 323634 SSED MGA94_50 652101.3 7049750.7 500 2.5 323635 SSED MGA94_50 652384.3 7048678.7 500 1.9 323636 SSED MGA94_50 653427.3 7047391.6 500 4 323637 SSED MGA94_50 653665.3 7046831.6 500 2.1 323640 SSED MGA94_50 654870.3 7044515.6 500 2.8 323641 SSED MGA94_50 656133.3 7041569.6 500 1.3 323642 SSED MGA94_50 656356.3 7040894.6 500 17.2 323643 SSED MGA94_50 656560.4 7039927.6 500 1.7 323644 SSED MGA94_50 656533.4 7039922.6 500 0.8 323645 SSED MGA94_50 656546.4 7039816.6 500 1.5 323652 SSED MGA94_50 650901.3 7052373.7 500 11.5 323653 SSED MGA94_50 651493.3 7049814.7 500 2.7 323654 SSED MGA94_50 650658.3 7048815.6 500 29.2 323655 SSED MGA94_50 65071